Home | Join/Donate | Current Voices | Liturgical Calendar | What's New | Affirmation | James Hitchcock's Column | Church Documents | Search
Voices Online Edition
Volume XVII, No. 2
Winner of Voices Young Writer's Award Contest
Whether Christ changed the role of woman
by Elizabeth Ruth Cheffers
Elizabeth Cheffers is a sixteen-year-old senior at Trivium School in South Lancaster, Massachusetts, the eldest of ten children of Grace and Mark Cheffers of Worcester. She plans to spend next year in Australia, her birthplace, working in an Opus Dei retreat house near Sydney. Trivium is a private school for grades 7-12.
This essay was her senior thesis. The assignment required following the format of the great 13th century Dominican scholastic theologian, Saint Thomas Aquinas. In his Summa theologica, this form included the question (Utrum... - whether...), the objections, the body of the argument (Sed contra - on the contrary), answering the objections (Respondeo dicendum), and conclusion - the form followed in this essay. We are pleased to inaugurate the Voices Publication Award with this essay, which we found thoughtful and engaging - and we suspect that the "Angelic Doctor" himself would agree. - Editor
[Details about the Young Writers Award.]
Whether Christ changed the role of woman.
"It is not good that man should be alone; I will make him a helper as his partner." (Gen 2:18)
With these words God created woman, and presented her to man so that they might in union fill and subdue the Earth. Unfortunately, man and woman sinned, and as a result, not only was their relationship with God distorted, but their relationship with each other was also damaged, such that the woman was subordinated to the man in an unnatural and false way. He made whole again the relationship between man and woman, and restored woman to her original place alongside man, but I say He did more than that. I say that Christ not only restored woman to her original position as a partner with man, but also lifted her up to be a partner with Him.
Someone might object to the starting premise that woman was in the original order equal in dignity to man by asking, "what could a woman be useful for that another man would not be able to do better?" For, the The Angelic Doctor says, woman was made, "not , indeed, as a helpmate in other works, as some say, but as a helper in the works of generation" because "man can be more efficiently helped by another man in other works".1 If woman was made solely for the purpose of generation, then she is clearly less a person than man, who exists for his own sake.
A second man might object to the statement that the relationship between man and woman could be changed. Aristotle himself says, "the male is by nature superior, and the female inferior; and the one rules, and the other is ruled. For that which can foresee by the exercise of the mind is by nature intended to be lord and master, and that which can with its body give effect to such foresight is a subject, and by nature a slave".2 Or in another place, "the female is a misbegotten male".3 Therefore, it is in man's very nature that he should rule over woman as his intellectual inferior. Christ would not change the nature of creatures.
On the contrary, Pope John Paul II says concerning the dignity of all women: "Each of them from the beginning inherits as a woman the dignity of personhood. Jesus of Nazareth confirms this dignity, recalls it, renews it, and makes it a part of the Gospel and of the Redemption".4
In order to fully understand how Christ elevated woman, we must first understand the role of woman in the garden, and then the role of woman after the Fall.
The words of Genesis "in the image of God He created them, male and female He created them" (Gen 1:27) make it clear that man and woman are both created in the image of God and so are equally persons, being made in the image of a personal God.5 The fact that they are both made in the image of God means not only that they are individually like Him. It also means that "man and woman, created as a 'unity of the two'6 in their common humanity, are called to live in a communion of love, and in this way to mirror in the world the communion of love that is in God, through which the Three Persons love each other in the intimate mystery of the one divine life".7 Or, as the Magisterium teaches in Gaudium et Spes, to be a person who fully images forth the Triune God means to be a person who "can only find himself through a sincere gift of self".8 Woman was created to help man live more fully in the image of God by being the one to whom man could give himself. If woman were meant to live for man, but not man for woman, then woman would reflect the image of God more fully than man.
Many people, influenced by the effects of original sin, think the fact that God created woman as a "helper" for man meant that he was to rule over and dominate her as his subject. But this is not true, for as Saint Thomas Aquinas says, "Subjection is twofold. One is servile, by virtue of which a superior makes use of his subjects for the superior's own benefit; and this kind of subjection began after sin. There is another kind of subjection which is called economic or civil, whereby the superior makes use of his subjects for the subject's own benefit; and this kind of subjection existed even before sin".9
It is clear that the second type of subjection is really a mutual subjection between the two parties. This is because if the superior puts the subject's benefit first, the superior subjects his will to the good of the subject before asking the subject to submit to him. Saint Paul, in his letter to the Ephesians, calls man and woman to live this out by a life of "mutual subjection out of reverence for Christ", (Eph 5:21) As John Paul II says, this idea of mutual subjection is clearly "an innovation of the Gospel",10 when seen in comparison with the old idea of the sole subjection of woman to man.
The order of the relationship between man and woman changes, of course, when man chooses to disobey God. After telling Eve that she will suffer pain in childbirth, God says, "Yet your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you". From this point on, the relationship between man and woman is inclined to be deformed by the first kind of subjection described by Saint Thomas; a superior making use of a subject for the superior's own benefit.
The effect of this curse can be clearly seen through history, and especially through the Old Testament. Although holy women are mentioned in the Old Testament, they are looked at as property of a man, not persons in their own right. This can be seen by the fact that many of the patriarchs had more than one wife. Jewish men even used to say a prayer of thanksgiving to God that they were made men, and not women.11
When Christ came, He changed the worldly perception of the inherent dignity of a woman. Christ treats women as persons in the own right; He does not hesitate to speak of the great matters of faith with them. He speaks to the Samaritan woman at the well about the "living water", (Jn 4:10) with Martha about the fact that He is "the resurrection and the life", (Jn 11:25) and calls an old woman with a stoop "a daughter of Abraham", (Lk 13:16) while up to the point only the phrase "son of Abraham" appeared in Scripture. Women are the only ones at the foot of the cross, besides Saint John. They are the first witnesses of the resurrection. Christ prays to the Father "that all may be one as we are one", and acts accordingly. Christ did not elevate woman to a place above man, but the change in the role of woman after Christ came was more dramatic than the change in the role of man. Christ had to first fully restore woman's dignity and personhood to her before He could elevate both man and woman to an even higher calling.
Christ introduces this higher calling, the concept of celibacy for the kingdom of heaven, when He says, "there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven. He who is able to receive this let him receive it" (Mt 19:12). Woman, as well as man, is elevated above her original position in the garden by this call to be a sign of heaven where "they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but live like angels in heaven" (Mk 12:25). Christ also elevates motherhood from a motherhood of the flesh to one of the spirit by being born of Mary. Just as all women had inherited the calling to be a physical mother from Eve, all women now inherit the calling to be a spiritual mother from Mary.
In answer to the first objection, that woman is useful only as a means for man to propagate the human race, because in an other matter a man would be better, I say that when God saw "it is not good for man to be alone" (Gen 2:18), He gave Adam not another man to heal his loneliness, but a woman. Man cannot give himself to another man as he can give himself to a woman.12 As was explained before, man and woman are not just made in the image of God individually, but as a communion of persons, they mirror the way in which the three persons of the Trinity complete one another. Because both man and woman are made in the image of God, the qualities of masculinity and femininity that each possesses are both present in God, and so each is necessary to complete the other's very being. Therefore, woman is created for her own sake as well as for man. The Church affirms the truth that women are not only necessary to produce children by stating that marriage has two ends; unitive and procreative.13 The old idea that polygamy is permissible is a clear effect of the idea that woman created for the purpose of generation. If woman were created for the purpose of propagating the human race, then it would be a good thing for a man to have more than one wife, because he could have more children. Marriage is not just for the purpose of procreation; it is also intended for the mutual perfection of the spouses.
In answer to the second objection, that it is reasonable that man should rule over woman: Aristotle is correct in that man is the natural head of woman. Aristotle is clearly affected by original sin, however, in his view of why a husband should practice this headship. Aristotle saw the relationship falsely because he started with the premise that woman is by nature a slave, not being intelligent enough to do anything but use her body.
Just because woman is, in the natural order, subject to man, does not mean that she is less intelligent. Presuming the analogy between the created and the creator, one could also ask why the Father is the sender and the Son is sent. Clearly it is not because of any deficiency in the Son. The mystery of why the Father is the initiator and why man is the head is too great to comprehend, but it is foolishness to assume that it is because of a higher level of intelligence.
In conclusion, it can be easily seen that when Christ came He restored to woman her original place with man. As the Church sings in the Easter sequence, however, the sin of Adam was a "Happy Fault", because when Christ came He lifted man and woman up to a place they had not possessed in the garden. He made them able to participate in the kingdom of heaven here on Earth through a life of celibacy. He elevated motherhood from a motherhood purely of flesh to one also of the spirit.
What Christ did not do was change the essential submissive character of femininity. He did something greater than simply giving woman earthly power. He made submission by free choice and out of love the highest good of mankind by His example of submission to the Father. The mystery of femininity, that "to serve means to reign" 14 is also the essential mystery and beauty of Christianty itself.
1. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica (New York:Fathers of the English Dominican Providence, 1920) http://www.newadvent.org
2. Aristotle, The Works of Aristotle-Politics (Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1921), 1253.
3. ibid, p. 1254
4. Pope John Paul II, Mulieris Dignitatem [Dignity and Vocation of Women] (Boston: Saint Paul Books and Media, 1988) http://www.vatican.va
6. Catechism of the Catholic Church (Saint Paul: The Wanderer Press, 1994), 414.
7. Pope John Paul II, Mulieris Dignitatem
9. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica (New York:Fathers of the English Dominican Providence, 1920) http://www.newadvent.org
10. Pope John Paul II, Mulieris Dignitatem
11. Louis Bouyer, Woman in the Church (New York: Ignatius Press, 1989), 35.
12. Pope John Paul II, Theology of the Body (Boston: Pauline Books and Media, 1997), 60
13. Catechism of the Catholic Church (Saint Paul: The Wanderer Press, 1994), 108.
14. Pope John Paul II, Mulieris Dignitatem
For information about Trivium School, contact
Trivium School, PO Box 187, South Lancaster, MA 01561
**Women for Faith & Family operates solely on your generous donations. **
WFF is a registered 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. Donations are tax deductible.
Voices copyright © 1999-Present
Women for Faith & Family. All rights reserved. PERMISSION GUIDELINES All material on this web site is copyrighted and may not be copied or reproduced without prior written permission from Women for Faith & Family,except as specified below. Personal use Quotations Attribution Link to Women for Faith & Family web site. Back to top -- Home -- Back to Table of Contents
Permission is granted to download and/or print out articles for personal use only.
Brief quotations (ca 500 words) may be made from the material on this site, in accordance with the “fair use” provisions of copyright law, without prior permission. For these quotations proper attribution must be made of author and WFF + URL (i.e., “Women for Faith & Family www.wf-f.org.)
Generally, all signed articles or graphics must also have the permission of the author. If a text does not have an author byline, Women for Faith & Family should be listed as the author. For example: Women for Faith & Family (St Louis: Women for Faith & Family, 2005 + URL)
Other web sites are welcome to establish links to www.wf-f.org or to individual pages within our site.
Women for Faith & Family
PO Box 300411
St. Louis, MO 63130
314-863-8385 Phone -- 314-863-5858 Fax -- Email
Voices copyright © 1999-Present Women for Faith & Family. All rights reserved.
All material on this web site is copyrighted and may not be copied or reproduced without prior written permission from Women for Faith & Family,except as specified below.
Link to Women for Faith & Family web site.
Back to top -- Home -- Back to Table of Contents