You are viewing an archived page on our old website. Click here to visit our new website.

Home | Join/Donate | Current Voices | Liturgical Calendar | What's New | Affirmation | James Hitchcock's Column | Church Documents | Search

Voices Online Edition
Fall 2000,
Volume XV, No. 3 - Jubilee Year

No matter how hard we try to cover it up or ignore it -

Truth Pressed to Earth Will Rise Again

by Susan E. Wills, Esq.

Susan E. Wills, is Assistant Director for Program Development, NCCB Secretariat for Pro-Life Activities. This column was originally published in Life Issues Forum and is reprinted here with permission.

Editor's Note: Just as we were going to press with this issue, an article in America magazine by two Jesuit priests active in "AIDS ministry" claimed that an essay by Monsignor Jacques Suaudeau of the Pontifical Council on the Family showed that the Vatican had reversed its constant teaching that use of condoms is always morally wrong -- a studied misreading of the essay, "Prophylactics or Family Values?", published in L'Osservatore Romano April 19.

The America article, "Tolerant Signals: the Vatican's new insights on condoms for HIV prevention", by Fathers Jon D. Fuller, SJ, and James Keenan, SJ, appeared in the September 23, 2000 edition. The secular press instantly and erroneously reported a "U-turn" in Church teaching on use of condoms.

The following column by Susan Wills, though written before this incident, is a most timely rebuttal to the false claims of Fathers Fuller and Keenan.

Good theology and good science both lead to truth. Catholic teaching about contraception does not depend on scientific discoveries, medical findings or sociology statistics. It rests on an understanding of the meaning and purpose of marriage and human sexuality, through which God continues to speak His yes to human life (G. Meilaender). But after 40 years of cultural hype, it is gratifying to see the failures and harmful effects of contraception recently exposed in prestigious publications. The wisdom of Church teaching is being validated, if inadvertently, by medicine and social science.

Teen birthrate
In the category of "Still Can't Read the Handwriting on the Wall", first prize goes to a Washington Post article entitled "Teen Birthrate Takes a Big Toll in Brazil; Pregnancies Soar Despite Access to Contraceptives". Utterly hoodwinked by Planned Parenthood's mantra, "contraceptives mean fewer pregnancies and fewer abortions", the author writes:

The birthrate among adolescents has soared, a mystifying development given the unprecedented efforts of the past decade here to provide more information about, and access to, contraceptives. Television commercials trumpet the use of condoms. Neighborhood clinics distribute birth-control pills and other contraceptives. Numerous cities have created programs to reduce the number of pregnancies and cases of sexually transmitted diseases among teens. Yet those efforts have found only limited success...

Limited success? From 1993 to 1998, the birthrate for Brazilian girls aged 15-19 jumped 19% and for girls aged 10-14 the birthrate leapt 31%. Also, the annual abortion rate for Brazilian teens ages 15-19 is tragically high: 32 per 1,000 girls (rivaling the appalling US rate of 36 per 1,000).

Clearly the answer is not more of the same failed policy. Condoms and oral contraceptives are not foolproof. "Typical use" failure rates are about 14% for condoms and 7.6% for oral contraceptives, but failures are even higher among teens because of imperfect use. And to make things even worse, contraceptives create a false sense of security and lead to higher levels of non-marital sex, promiscuity, pregnancy, abortion, non-marital births and sexually transmitted disease.

AIDS epidemic
The runner-up article in the category "I Can See Clearly Now" comes from a recent issue of The Lancet. It attributes the gravely worsening AIDS epidemic in southern Africa to condoms unhelpfully supplied by the U.S. and international agencies. The author notes that condoms are not only ineffective in stopping the transmission of AIDS, but have actually exacerbated the epidemic by fostering the false belief that promiscuous sexual activity can be safe.

The US is awash in contraceptives which have proved to be no help in reducing rates of pregnancy, birth and abortions. Nor are they helping to eradicate STDs. Cases of incurable viral STDs in the US are epidemic. About 45 million Americans have genital herpes. One million new cases are added annually. Human papilloma virus, the primary cause of cervical cancer, now affects 20 million Americans. Some 5.5 million new cases are added each year. Hepatitis B afflicts 750,000 Americans and 77,000 new cases occur each year. HIV claims 650-900,000 victims in the U.S. currently, with 20,000 new cases added annually (Medical Institute for Sexual Health).

The winning entry in the "I Can See Clearly Now" category appeared in the February 2000 issue of the AMA's Archives of Family Medicine: "Post-fertilization Effects of Oral Contraceptives and Their Relationship to Informed Consent", by Walter Larimore, MD and Joseph Stanford, MD. Reviewing abstracts of all studies of oral contraceptives (OCs) published since 1970 and available on MEDLINE, the doctors concluded that good evidence exist to support the hypothesis that the effectiveness of oral contraceptives depends to some degree on post-fertilization effects. Women taking OCs may still sometimes ovulate (more likely with today's lower doses of estrogen, with progestin-only pills and with imperfect use) and the resultant egg may be fertilized, creating a new life. The embryo's life may be cut short in its first week, without the mother's knowledge, by the OC's actions in slowing the embryo's progress through the fallopian tubes or in altering the uterine lining to prevent successful implantation or maintenance. Because many patients morally oppose taking their child's life even at the embryonic stage, and few are aware of this property of OCs, the authors recommend explaining this potential action to all prospective users of OCs as a matter of informed consent. Based on this research, Dr. Larimore stopped prescribing OCs due to their potential for terminating new life and now recommends modern methods of natural family planning to his patients.

Even as such medical findings and statistics publicly reveal the dark side of the contraceptive revolution, we hear continued calls for funding adolescent contraception, for increased availability of emergency contraception and for more money for international family planning.

Will we never learn?

**Women for Faith & Family operates solely on your generous donations!

WFF is a registered 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. Donations are tax deductible.

Voices copyright © 1999-Present Women for Faith & Family. All rights reserved.


All material on this web site is copyrighted and may not be copied or reproduced without prior written permission from Women for Faith & Family,except as specified below.

Personal use
Permission is granted to download and/or print out articles for personal use only.

Brief quotations (ca 500 words) may be made from the material on this site, in accordance with the “fair use” provisions of copyright law, without prior permission. For these quotations proper attribution must be made of author and WFF + URL (i.e., “Women for Faith & Family –

Generally, all signed articles or graphics must also have the permission of the author. If a text does not have an author byline, Women for Faith & Family should be listed as the author. For example: Women for Faith & Family (St Louis: Women for Faith & Family, 2005 + URL)

Link to Women for Faith & Family web site.
Other web sites are welcome to establish links to or to individual pages within our site.

Back to top -- Home -- Back to the Table of Contents
Women for Faith & Family
PO Box 300411
St. Louis, MO 63130

314-863-8385 Phone -- 314-863-5858 Fax -- Email

You are viewing an archived page on our old website. Click here to visit our new website.