by James Hitchcock
The horrendous events of September 11 confront us with a reality even more disturbing than our apparent vulnerability to terrorist attacks. They require us to reexamine our entire understanding of the nature of reality.
In the face of unimaginable catastrophe there has been much talk about tragedy, human suffering, heroism, cowardice, patriotism, and resisting hatred, all of which are true as far as they go.
But events now confront us with realities so enormous that little can be said, and our culture's ultimate failure is that it actively works against the ability to understand such things. As most Westerners view reality, there is no reason why such things should happen. Thus it seems that those who perpetrate such acts have simply made certain mistakes of understanding, reinforced by excessive emotion. Terrorism, we are told, solves nothing. The terrorists' grievances are understandable, but they have chosen the wrong methods.
For some people the whole episode revolves around technical problems - better security systems, the necessity henceforth to be more vigilant, in ways other peoples simply take for granted. For others the solution is a retaliation against the terrorists, followed by diplomatic efforts to "get to the root of the problem". What these have in common is the assumption that what we face is containable and comprehensible within the categories of understanding which our culture permits.
People turn to religion at such moments, but even the most devout realize the limits of the comfort which the faith provides for bereaved people. Christianity offers no "answer" to the questions, no coherent resolution of all perplexities. Rather it speaks of the "mystery of iniquity". The common religious responses are not wrong - comfort for the bereaved, the promise of resurrection, a righteous desire for justice, love of enemies. But none of these explain "why". Rather our faith opens us to the eternal and cosmic perspective.
This is not only our belief that the dead still live in Christ, which provides comfort and meaning in a way no purely worldly creed can equal. It means rather that our faith makes us understand that events of this kind are not merely bizarre anomalies. We are engaged, as we always have been, in a war against principalities and powers, something we can forget only because of the numerous comforts our culture provides.
Despite our Puritan heritage, most Americans simply do not believe in evil. They prefer to believe in "mistakes", "failure to grow", "misguided zeal", "social causes,", "lack of empathy for others" and similar rationalizations. We apply those ideas routinely to our own lives, thus we see the cosmic picture in the same way.
The two common explanations of terrorism are a sense of injustice and religious fanaticism, and both are real enough.
Predictably, fanaticism will be used to argue that religious belief is a dangerous thing, the source of many of the world's evils, and there is a point to that claim, albeit not the one which its proponents make. Precisely because religion does put us in touch with the deepest wellsprings of existence, it has the greatest potential for both good and evil. A religionless world, whatever else it might be, would be a spiritually impoverished world. Religion is indeed a volatile substance, precisely because it is the realm where good and evil directly meet.
The "problem of evil" is insoluble even for Christians, because finally we do not know why the all-good God permits evil, although our greatest glory -- our freedom -- is also the instrument by which we thwart the divine will.
Since God cannot create evil, Christianity defines evil as nothingness, the absence of being, as Saint Thomas Aquinas calls it. At first this may seem specious, but the events of September 11 show quite dramatically that it is so. The essence of the terrorist act is to reduce being to nothingness. Before our very eyes, some of the most imposing monuments of our prosperous society are reduced to dust, even as thousands of human beings cease to exist in this world. The essence of all evil is to make something into nothing. The climax of the latest terrorist acts was the willful annihilation of the terrorists' own selves, the ultimate act of allegiance to nothingness.
For motives we find difficult to understand, this urge to annihilate has a powerful fascination. Thus, if the apparent causes of terrorism were removed, things of this kind would still occur, because they are rooted in human nature gone awry. Political and religious grievances provide the rationale for such actions, but such things happen every day on the personal level.
Religion has to do with ultimate reality. God, Saint Thomas tells us, is pure being, the fullness of existence. But Satan is a fallen angel whose own limitations nurture a horrifying hatred of all that is good, a hatred of being itself. The power of evil is the power of a vacuum - a nothingness which sucks everything into itself in order to destroy.
The events of September 11 have inevitably brought into focus the various ways in which our culture teaches people to evade recognition of evil. Some, predictably, recognize it but see it in the victims. They issue long lists of conditions which the United States must fulfill before it can even begin to ask for justice. But in the minds of such people America is the cause of most of the evil in the world, so the list will never be complete.
A variant convenient way of avoiding confrontation with evil is the positing of moral equivalency - the claim that an act of such magnitude must have been provoked by some equal injustice. Why else would anyone do such a thing?
A leading guru of the New Age movement gave a presentation in which he talked about - himself. He had, he confessed, discovered violent feelings even within himself. Fortunately this gave him the opportunity to take his listeners through a meditation exercise guaranteed to eradicate those feelings. His claim was intriguing because of its incorrigible self-centeredness - the guru forswore all thoughts of vengeance by pretending that the universe is contained within his own head.
A student leader smiled cheerfully on television as she said, "I'm really proud of the way this has been a real growth experience for most students", as though the havoc were worthwhile because of the challenges it offered.
Among some religious believers evasion took the familiar form of treating evil as a mere personal inadequacy, to be overcome by sincere effort. Thus we were solemnly exhorted to cultivate peaceful attitudes and to "reach out" to others, who would then reciprocate, without even a clue as to why, realistically, attitudes of peacefulness on our part will lead to a change of heart by our enemies.
On the eve of World War II the most influential American theologian of the twentieth century, Reinhold Niebuhr, broke with many of his fellow liberal Protestants because of their lack of realism, their inability to recognize the menacing evil which then confronted civilization.
On one level their failure might have been dismissed as pious sentimentality. But Niebuhr understood that it made otherwise good people into apologists for evil, so eager were they to avoid confrontation with it. It was also another manifestation of self-centeredness - projecting onto others, who live thousands of miles away both geographically and culturally, our own fondest beliefs.
Crises are a basic test of religion, and our religion passes that test, as shown by the many people who spontaneously turned to faith during the latest crisis. But some spokesmen for religion in fact make it irrelevant, implying that being a believer means dreaming about the world as we would like it to be, the sort of escapism which religion's critics have always charged it with.
Sentimental people persist in seeing a peaceful world just around the corner, so that, when events like those of September 11 occur, they react like a man convinced that one more round of tinkering with his backyard invention will at last produce a working perpetual-motion machine.
The blunt truth is that Christianity teaches us that we will never, short of the end of time, achieve a world of perfect peace and justice. That does not mean that we are absolved from working towards it, nor that in certain periods we might seem closer to it than at others. But the perfect society will never come. That is what Original Sin means.
Those who deny that religion has anything to do with terrorism miss the point. No doubt such terrorism is a perversion of the highest teachings of Islam. But all religions, including Christianity, contain things which are available for such perversion. Those who kill in the name of religion are seldom merely using it as an excuse. Usually they are believers whose sinfulness leads them to turn good into evil.
Perhaps the ultimate evasion is the assumption that the events of September 11 are so extreme that they manifest an exotic reality which need only concern us in times of emergency. But to think that is to miss the most basic reality. Deliberate mass murder is unique only in its magnitude, the events of September 11 unique only in the dramatic way in which they manifested evil. The somber truth it that actions of this kind go on all the time.
There was a startling report by a terrorism expert that each year about thirty pilots deliberately crash their small planes in an attempt to kill themselves and someone they hate - an ex-spouse, a former employer. "Serial killers", who kill only for their own gratification, are a recognized category in our society, and every day there are numerous malicious assaults on essentially innocent people. Such things are not of course the whole story of human nature, but they are a necessary part of it.
The idea of moral equivalency is attractive because it seems to lessen evil - terrorism occurs only because of injustices done to the terrorists. But believing that requires believing that every violent act, anywhere at any time, must have understandable motives. It ignores the reality of irrational hatred, of malice.
It is in recognizing this that religion begins to show its ultimate relevance. Believing in evil does not automatically dictate any particular course of action in any particular situation. But it ought to be the first condition for anyone claiming to have something to say about terrorism.
There are at least three ways of understanding evil, which is the most intractable mystery of the universe. Historically perhaps the earliest of these is dualism. The universe is divided into two kingdoms, one of good, the other of evil, which are perpetually at war with one another. Each is ruled of some kind of divinity, and the end of history will be the final separation of the two, when they will cease to have any relation to each other.
A second theory holds evil to be an illusion. Thus the pain of physical suffering, of personal loss, of the frustration of one's desires, all evaporate if one cultivates the appropriate spirit of detachment. Evil is an illusion because the good of which it is a negation is itself an illusion. The goal of existence is to get beyond the possibility of desiring anything.
The third theory is the Christian idea that evil is nothingness. It differs from the first in that it does not concede evil an equal place with good and from the second because it affirms the goodness of the world, the loss of which is evil.
It does not declare, for example, that losing a loved one is insignificant because human attachments are illusory. Rather it affirms the good of the universe and defines evil as the privation of that good. Death is evil because it is the loss of life, illness the loss of health, adultery the loss of love and trust. Some Christians find this theory incredible but only, I suspect, because they have not bothered to think much about it. Theologians came to this view of evil because of their realization that an all-good God could not create evil, hence evil cannot really exist. "God saw what he had made, and it was good" (Genesis). "Call nothing unclean which I have made" (Acts).
Some Christians misunderstand what is meant by calling evil "nothingness". They fear that the concept will induce complacency in people who think they have nothing to be concerned about. But in the physical world the vacuum (or what physicists call "black holes") show that nothingness is not without a perverse kind of power. So also, various kinds of deprivation - of food, water, air - are powerfully destructive, although the deprivations are not anything in themselves. Recognizing evil as nothingness need not make one complacent. The absence of food makes one anxious (and highly motivated to find food). One drives very carefully on a mountain road where the shoulder has disappeared.
The existence of the personal devil at first seems to contradict this. But the nature of Satan's evil is precisely that which he lost by his rebellion against God, by his great "No!" and he seeks to entice human beings into giving up these same goods. He has nothing real to offer. He traffics in illusions.
Hell -- eternal punishment for evil -- is primarily a state of profound loss, of ultimate nothingness. But it is also a place of eternal fire, something which exists only by consuming other things in its unceasing drive to reduce everything to nothing.
Christians today are ill-equipped to confront evil in its numerous forms precisely because they have lost this understanding of evil as negation. They cannot look into that black hole because it is too horrifying. They prefer to believe that what has traditionally been called evil (a word many would not even allow themselves to use) is merely a mistake, a failure of understanding, a misguided sense of good.
Thirty years ago there were experiments in recasting the Ten Commandments in "positive" forms -- urging people to do good instead of forbidding them to do evil. The experiment failed for a number of reasons, not least because deep down most people do have an inchoate sense of evil and realize that, for example, the injunction "respect human life" does not get to the same reality as "thou shalt not kill".
The mystery of evil lies in the fact that there is something in human nature (as in the angelic nature of Satan) which makes nothingness attractive, the moral equivalent of the urge some people feel, when standing atop a high building, to throw themselves off.
James Hitchcock, professor of history at St. Louis University, writes and lectures on contemporary Church matters. He has just completed the manuscript of a book on religion and the Supreme Court. "Confronting Evil", originally appeared as three separate columns in various diocesan newspapers. They were written September 14, 27 and October 12, 2001. Email: Dr. James Hitchcock
James Hitchcock Column online
**Women for Faith & Family operates solely on your generous donations!
WFF is a registered 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. Donations are tax deductible.
Voices copyright © 1999-Present
Women for Faith & Family. All rights reserved. PERMISSION GUIDELINES All material on this web site is copyrighted and may not be copied or reproduced without prior written permission from Women for Faith & Family,except as specified below. Personal use Quotations Attribution Link to Women for Faith & Family web site. Back to top -- Home -- Back to Table of Contents
Permission is granted to download and/or print out articles for personal use only.
Brief quotations (ca 500 words) may be made from the material on this site, in accordance with the “fair use” provisions of copyright law, without prior permission. For these quotations proper attribution must be made of author and WFF + URL (i.e., “Women for Faith & Family www.wf-f.org.)
Generally, all signed articles or graphics must also have the permission of the author. If a text does not have an author byline, Women for Faith & Family should be listed as the author. For example: Women for Faith & Family (St Louis: Women for Faith & Family, 2005 + URL)
Other web sites are welcome to establish links to www.wf-f.org or to individual pages within our site.
Women for Faith & Family
PO Box 300411
St. Louis, MO 63130
314-863-8385 Phone -- 314-863-5858 Fax -- Email
Voices copyright © 1999-Present Women for Faith & Family. All rights reserved.
All material on this web site is copyrighted and may not be copied or reproduced without prior written permission from Women for Faith & Family,except as specified below.
Link to Women for Faith & Family web site.
Back to top -- Home -- Back to Table of Contents